'Hope this year will bring peace and prosperity to the much grieve world!' was the Facebook status of one of my friends. He happens to be a PhD. in English Literature, well employed as an Assistant Professor in the Department. And by virtue of his Doctorate, he features in high profile forums and meetings and have been given some lead in the Department as well. But, as the quotation rightly elucidates, he is, in actuality, a very volatile 'scholar' having decided flaws and shortcomings when it comes to using English as a language. 'Scholars' like him are to be spotted quite frequently in Departments, who claim that they do good research. Therefore, people who do research are not always in possession of comprehensive knowledge, threfore those who have a strong reading habit should only teach in the Department, irrespective of their interest in research.
However, researchers are important assets of a country. Their research creats new knowledge which in turn is fed into industries to value add products and services. Without good researches, mankind would've stuck in the same place, and societies wouldn't have marched forward and prospered. But since the researchers focus on a very narrow field for research purposes, they understandably don't possess a thorough and sound knowledge on the whole subject matter, quite unlike an engrossing and passionate reader who reads for pleasure and sheer knowledge.
Since a reader's job is to read compulsively, it is more likely that he would take interest in his teaching assignment and read accordingly to deliver lectures worth the students' time. They would be able to explain better, due to their having an upper hand with the field of knowledge in general, and the teaching/ learning quality in the classroom would improve manifold. This is not to say that researchers will not teach, for they definitely will. But preferably to a limited extent. Their main job in the department would be to do research, coach students with their research projects and publish quality research for the consumption of all stakeholders, including the teachers who, obviously, would read and incorporate the new information in their lectures in classrooms.
This arrangement of people having genuine knack of research doing mostly just that, and people who love reading and teaching doing so, would increase the research/ teaching objectives of the university, and be most beneficial for all concerned. This would also solve problems arising from the requirements that teachers would 'have to' do research even if it's not their first priority, and that researchers are expected to have a holistic knowledge in the field and teach flawlessly in classrooms.
As mentioned earlier, teaching and researching are both equally important and crucial for the success of any higher seat of learning. A good, well informed teacher can motivate and inspire students in more ways than can be imagined. Similarly, a good researcher plays a vital role in producing new knowledge for the society and mankind. Without needing one to have his finger in both the pies, both the teacher and the researcher can contribute for the benefit of students and the society at large.
However, researchers are important assets of a country. Their research creats new knowledge which in turn is fed into industries to value add products and services. Without good researches, mankind would've stuck in the same place, and societies wouldn't have marched forward and prospered. But since the researchers focus on a very narrow field for research purposes, they understandably don't possess a thorough and sound knowledge on the whole subject matter, quite unlike an engrossing and passionate reader who reads for pleasure and sheer knowledge.
Since a reader's job is to read compulsively, it is more likely that he would take interest in his teaching assignment and read accordingly to deliver lectures worth the students' time. They would be able to explain better, due to their having an upper hand with the field of knowledge in general, and the teaching/ learning quality in the classroom would improve manifold. This is not to say that researchers will not teach, for they definitely will. But preferably to a limited extent. Their main job in the department would be to do research, coach students with their research projects and publish quality research for the consumption of all stakeholders, including the teachers who, obviously, would read and incorporate the new information in their lectures in classrooms.
This arrangement of people having genuine knack of research doing mostly just that, and people who love reading and teaching doing so, would increase the research/ teaching objectives of the university, and be most beneficial for all concerned. This would also solve problems arising from the requirements that teachers would 'have to' do research even if it's not their first priority, and that researchers are expected to have a holistic knowledge in the field and teach flawlessly in classrooms.
As mentioned earlier, teaching and researching are both equally important and crucial for the success of any higher seat of learning. A good, well informed teacher can motivate and inspire students in more ways than can be imagined. Similarly, a good researcher plays a vital role in producing new knowledge for the society and mankind. Without needing one to have his finger in both the pies, both the teacher and the researcher can contribute for the benefit of students and the society at large.
No comments:
Post a Comment